- The below is from Commissioner Terry’s newsletter sent on June 9, 2026.
- For more information on the policies Commissioner Terry is advocating for click here.
Data Centers remain a topic in DeKalb County. Today, June 9, the Board of Commissioners voted to extend a data center moratorium for 100 days.
I advocated for the moratorium to be extended for a year while we continue to learn about this new technology and policies we need in place to protect our communities. Commissioner Long Spears offered a friendly amendment to extend the moratorium for 9 months. This vote failed.

Image: Voting record showing who voted YES for a 9 month moratorium and who voted NO for a 9 month moratorium.
It has been very clear to me we don’t yet fully understand the impacts data centers may have on our communities. New reports highlighting these issues continue to come out, such as extreme heat island, that our draft regulations don’t yet consider. Additionally, the Georgia Public Service Commission and State Legislature may add additional regulations into next year. This conversation is ongoing and will continue to evolve.
A moratorium is crucial to ensure nothing of harm is allowed by right while this conversation evolves. DeKalb County can’t afford to give up our precious land for boxes that may sit vacant in a matter of years.
While this conversation has evolved, my stance has remained the same: Protect Our Communities and Our Environment.
Throughout the discussion today, my position and policies on data centers was wrongly twisted and spun. I have always been transparent and centered the residents. From hosting a data center town hall that allowed for full open public comment with no questions or comments pre screened to listening to residents and advocating for our regulations to adapt to their needs.
Some of These Policies Include:
- Agenda Item 2026-0158: Stating how tax revenue would be spent IF a data center were to be approved and built in DeKalb County, ensuring residents that may bear the costs receive the majority of the benefits.
- Agenda Item 2026-0341: Advocating the proposed data center regulations be adjusted to highlight community concerns including removing the option for data center campuses, no data center to be built by right therefor requiring a Special Land Use Permit for ALL applications, and clean energy incentives. Since introducing this in February, the conversation has evolved and needs expanded. What I am advocating for in our regulations has since expanded.
The Facts Are Clear:
- Hyperscale data centers require an astronomical amount of electricity, largely to power and cool the thousands of servers needed for AI. A single campus can require as much power as a small city. This sudden surge in demand strains local energy grids, increasing the risk of brownouts. As utility companies like Georgia Power are forced to build new infrastructure to meet this commercial demand, the costs are often passed down to residential ratepayers. Because renewable sources cannot currently meet the massive 24/7 power requirements of these facilities, utility companies are extending the lifespans of dirty coal plants and building new natural gas facilities to keep up.
- Data centers generate immense heat and rely heavily on evaporative cooling systems. A large data center can consume roughly the same daily indoor water use of a town of 50,000 people. Much of this water is permanently lost to evaporation rather than returning to the local water table, creating severe tension in areas prone to drought or with limited municipal water supplies.
- Communities located near data centers consistently complain of a constant, low-frequency hum from industrial cooling fans and the roaring of massive backup diesel or gas generators. This noise travels easily, penetrates homes, and operates around the clock. They require massive tracts of land, often replacing forests, agricultural land, or spaces that could be used for housing or higher-density commercial development.
- Despite their massive physical and environmental footprint, data centers are highly automated. Once the initial construction phase is over, a massive hyperscale campus might only employ 50 to 150 full-time workers (mostly security and maintenance).
I challenge any of my collogues to join me in debating these issues.
As always, I remain committed to transparency and ensuring our regulations are strong to protect our communities and environment. I will keep you updated as this topic evolves.
Ted


























